Where does yahoo come up with these so called top contributors?

Q: all they do is give the wrong info take this one for example http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;... i mean really every thing this so called top contributor was wrong.. every school kid knows that Washington was from a poor family.. and that he married into money when he married the widow Martha.. also every school child should know that Washington didn't fight to reconcile with england, that to even fight against the crown was considered treason.. also Washington never picked his generals congress did ,Washington never trusted a one of them they all wanted his command from the get go... and this is a so called top contributor? and this is more out there like this person what do they teach in schools now days? an aide wasn't a general for one, an aide is norm a Lt or a Major or in that matter... Washington never choose gates,Clinton or any other ones that led troops.... congress chose these men not him... also why would he want to be the leader of the troops that were fighting the crown but still want to make up with the crown? he knew the crown would never reconcile with the colonies...

A: They're not always accurate, they're just always answering, I'm not sure where they find the time to answer all those questions. The link isn't working so I'm not sure what that's about. The "top contributors" are usually just people with a lot of time on their hands to research questions and answer them. In most cases they don't know the answer they look it up, I've seen instances in which a top contributor answered a question that asked how a certain person felt about slavery, the answer at first was "he was anti slavery" but a few minutes later there was a long Wiki copied answer and at the end of it the guy said "it was clear he supported slavery".

Related items